ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Evaluation of the contextualized sexual and reproductive health educational strategy "Rurankapak": a mixed-methods quasi-experimental study among adolescents and young people in Ecuador.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) educational interventions in Ecuador show uneven effectiveness, particularly among adolescents and young people in socioculturally diverse settings. Although the "Rurankapak" methodology has been implemented as a participatory SRH education strategy, its standardized application has limited cultural relevance, acceptability, and sustainability. Objectives: To collaboratively adapt the Rurankapak methodology for SRH education to diverse sociocultural contexts and to preliminarily assess its applicability and acceptability among adolescents and young people in Ecuador. Methods: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study was conducted in three phases. The qualitative phase included semi-structured interviews with key informants experienced in Rurankapak implementation, analyzed using thematic coding. Findings informed a participatory redesign process involving Obstetrics students trained as peer facilitators. The quantitative phase followed a before-after design, applying the adapted intervention to four population groups and administering pre-post knowledge assessments (Cronbach's Results: Qualitative findings identified the need to strengthen pre-workshop planning, referral pathways, and the management of complex topics. An adapted version of Rurankapak was developed, structured into seven educational stations with culturally tailored materials. Quantitative results showed high acceptability among adolescents and young people, with lower acceptance among parents. Peer facilitators demonstrated strong pedagogical performance and reported improvements in communication skills, empathy, and intercultural competence. Conclusions: Contextual adaptation and participatory redesign enhance the cultural relevance and feasibility of SRH educational strategies. The use of peer facilitators supports adolescent engagement and contributes to the comprehensive training of future SRH professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.