Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799156›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2026

Cardiovascular risk prediction in women: rethinking traditional approaches through precision medicine.

Zainab Atiyah Dakhil, Sama Atta Gitti, Rasha Kaddoura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zainab Atiyah DakhilAl-Kindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Sama Atta GittiAl-Kindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Rasha KaddouraHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in women. Estimating cardiovascular risk using prediction models is essential for guiding preventive strategies. Despite progress, conventional risk models still omit critical women-specific factors, limiting their accuracy. Precision medicine, supported by artificial intelligence, provides a framework to integrate these overlooked determinants. This approach may help close existing gaps in cardiovascular risk prediction. Sex-specific biomarkers that contribute to overall cardiovascular risk can be incorporated into risk assessment tools to improve prevention strategies, early detection, and personalized intervention. The integration of imaging-derived variables enhances diagnosis accuracy. Moreover, pharmacokinetic modeling may help optimize therapy and reduce adverse events. Future research should focus on refining risk prediction algorithms that incorporate women-specific cardiovascular risk. Herein, we explore how addressing the burden of CVD in women through precision medicine requires a tailored approach that considers sex-specific risk factors, hormonal influences, biomarkers, and imaging modalities. This review provides a descriptive synthesis of current evidence and highlights existing knowledge gaps and future directions in precision medicine for cardiovascular risk prediction in women.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegenderrisk modelsexwomen

Identifiers

PMID41799156
PMCPMC12962947

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.