ReviewTheranostics2026
Tumor metabolic plasticity in therapy resistance: from the Warburg effect to mitochondrial hijacking.
Review in Theranostics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Functions of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Gastric Cancer: From Molecular Processes to Potential Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting the Warburg Effect in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Metabolic Vulnerabilities and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- GPX4 Defines an Immune-Cold Phenotype and Poor Prognosis in Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical efficacy of targeted cancer therapies is persistently undermined by the emergence of acquired resistance. While secondary genetic mutations are well-characterized, increasing evidence implicates non-genetic metabolic reprogramming as a primary driver of survival during the initial phase of treatment. This review elucidates the concept of "Metabolic Shapeshifters"-specifically, drug-tolerant persister cells (DTPs) that dynamically adapt their bioenergetic machinery to evade therapeutic stress. We examine the plasticity between the classical Warburg Effect and the Reverse Warburg Effect, describing how DTPs shift from a glucose-addicted proliferative state to a quiescent phenotype strictly reliant on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and fatty acid oxidation. Crucially, we highlight a paradigm shift from intracellular reprogramming to intercellular "organelle parasitism." Recent breakthroughs demonstrate that DTPs actively hijack functional mitochondria from infiltrating immune cells and the stromal network via tunneling nanotubes (TNTs). This predatory behavior not only restores the tumor's respiratory capacity but also induces metabolic exhaustion in T cells, thereby orchestrating immune evasion. Finally, we delineate emerging therapeutic strategies designed to dismantle this metabolic fortress. By targeting the "Achilles' heel" of mitochondrial dependency, disrupting the physical infrastructure of organelle hijacking, and revitalizing immunometabolism, we propose a multi-pronged framework to eradicate DTPs and prevent clinical relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.