ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
Men's involvement in contraception: a qualitative study exploring the perceptions and practices of general practitioners in France.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore French general practitioners' (GPs) views and practices regarding men's involvement in contraception. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study between March and November 2023 with 15 GPs from three primary care facilities in western France. Three focus groups (five GPs per site) were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed iteratively using a thematic approach inspired by grounded theory, following Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Results: Three conceptual categories emerged: (1) diverse perceptions and increasing involvement of men in contraception; (2) variation in professional practices and knowledge; (3) a normative and institutional environment that hinders male involvement. While some participants described evolving social expectations, contraceptive responsibility was still largely perceived as female. Gender-related norms and knowledge gaps influenced perceptions and options presented to patients, limiting fully informed choice. However, some participants challenged these norms and sought to encourage patients to reconsider their options. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the perceptions and practices of GPs regarding men's involvement in contraception. It highlights the need to strengthen training on contraceptive methods and encourage reflection on gender issues, and suggests that public policies and pharmaceutical initiatives could support fairer practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.