ReviewFrontiers in genetics2026
Regulatory roles of the circRNA-RBP axis in exercise-induced skeletal muscle remodeling: mechanistic controversies and translational illusions.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic health and physical performance rely upon skeletal muscle adaptation that is a result of exercise. Recent advancements in high-throughput sequencing and functional genomics have successfully identified a vast landscape of exercise-responsive circRNAs, providing critical insights into the molecular complexity of muscle adaptation. While these studies have established a foundational framework for understanding the circRNA-RBP axis, there are serious issues related to current research. There are serious issues related to current research: an insufficient level of endogenous circRNA to produce substantial ceRNA effects, unconfirmed circRNA scaffolding due to overactivity of RBPs, poor conservation of so-called exercise-related circRNAs evolutionarily, and the over-interpretation of specific effects. The article focuses on basic concerns of the ceRNA model quantitative limitations, and specificity debate of the scaffolding model, current model and technical gaps, etc. and suggests an experimental framework transitioning from "narrative models" to "physiologically credible mechanisms," offering references for future rigorous research and elucidating the authentic role of the circRNA-RBP axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.