Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799355›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026

Gender-based determinants of psychological distress among emerging adult students in coastal Karnataka: a cross-sectional study.

Ajith K Remesan, Varalakshmi Chandra Sekaran, Teddy Andrews Jaihind Jothikaran, Anish V Cherian, Lena Ashok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ajith K RemesanDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Varalakshmi Chandra SekaranDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-3075
Teddy Andrews Jaihind JothikaranDepartment of Social and Health Innovation, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Anish V CherianDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work and NIMHANS - Suicide Prevention, Research, Implementation, Training and Engagement (N-SPRITE) Centre, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Lena AshokDepartment of Social and Health Innovation, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psychological distress is one of the major public health challenges during the emerging adulthood period, which is a developmental stage characterized by major life transformations and instability. Emerging adults are more vulnerable to psychological distress as they frequently deal with different pressures about relationships, work, education and identity exploration. The rising prevalence of psychological distress can impair physical health and wellbeing along with the initiation of harmful behaviors such as substance use. Aim: The study aims to explore the prevalence and associated factors of psychological distress among emerging adult students, comparing female and male participants. Method: Data were collected from 957 emerging adults in 12 institutions under Mangalore University in the Udupi district of Karnataka, India, pursuing bachelor's degrees. Along with the sociodemographic pro forma, the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) was used to measure psychological distress, the World Health Organization's Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening tool (WHO ASSIST version 3.0) was used to measure substance use, and the Adverse Childhood Experiences Scale was used to identify adverse childhood experiences. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were employed to understand the determinants of psychological distress among participants. Results: Female participants reported a higher risk of experiencing psychological distress compared to male participants. Overall, 27.06% of participants experienced psychological distress, with 11.8% likely to have mild, 9.71% moderate and 5.53% severe mental disorders. While adverse childhood experiences were reported to be a major factor associated with psychological distress among both the groups (AOR 6.218, 95% CI (3.546, 10.901), Conclusion: In the study setting, psychological distress was prevalent among emerging adults, with a higher incidence among females. Adverse childhood events and substance use further elevated vulnerability. These findings highlight the critical need for culturally relevant and gender-sensitive mental health interventions.

Indexed as

adverse childhood experiencesCOVID19emerging adultsgenderpsychological distresssubstance usesustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID41799355
PMCPMC12964065

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.