Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799420›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

From "Form" to "Essence": Guiding Students to Achieve Deep Cognitive Transition in Morphological Experiments.

Xiaorun Zhai, Gaoshang Chai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaorun ZhaiDepartment of Basic Medicine, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214122, People's Republic of China.
Gaoshang ChaiDepartment of Basic Medicine, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214122, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Within the basic medical education system, morphological experiment courses constitute the cornerstone for building students' medical cognitive framework. However, the traditional "see-and-memorize" teaching model readily traps students in the cognitive dilemma of "seeing the trees but not the forest.". Methods: Based on years of teaching practice and reflection, this paper proposes a systematic teaching reform plan centered on the "Three-Tier Observation Method." This scheme aims, through progressive training in "macroscopic localization → microscopic identification → logical reasoning", to resolve the issue of passive student learning and guide them through a cognitive upgrade-from static morphological recognition to the interpretation of dynamic pathological processes. This article presents this approach as a descriptive educational innovation, detailing its theoretical rationale, operational procedures, and illustrative case analyses. Results: This paper presents the "Three-Tier Observation Method" as a descriptive educational innovation. It details the method's theoretical rationale, operational procedures, and illustrative case analyses to demonstrate its potential to help students construct a solid bridge between basic medical science and clinical practice. Discussion: We aim to provide educators with a practical and replicable teaching framework that fosters deeper cognitive integration, thereby contributing to the pedagogical toolkit for enhancing clinical reasoning skills in basic medical education.

Indexed as

medical educationmorphological experimentspathological thinkingteaching reformthree-tier observation method

Identifiers

PMID41799420
PMCPMC12966589

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.