SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) in Africa: a systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) are crucial for strengthening public health systems in Africa but faces implementation challenges. Despite the growing utility of implementation theories, models, and frameworks in assessing the determinants of innovation implementation, no implementation research theories have examined the determinants of IDSR implementation. This systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators of IDSR implementation in Africa using a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Methods: We systematically searched four databases, EMBASE, PUBMED, CINAHL, and Scopus, for studies on IDSR assessments in Africa published between 2010 and 2025. Data on barriers and facilitators were extracted and mapped to CFIR domains and constructs and analyzed deductively using content analysis and inductively using thematic analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Appraisal Tool. The review was reported in alignment with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Results: Thirty-seven studies were included in this analysis. Six CFIR domains and 24 constructs explained the determinants of IDSR implementation. The key barriers identified were limited resources, inadequate access to knowledge/information, and structural constraints in the inner-setting domain. Individual domain factors, such as low motivation and capability, also emerged as crucial barriers. Facilitators included structural characteristics, improved access to knowledge, and adequate resources in the inner setting domain as well as positive innovation outcomes in the outcome domain. Conclusion: The implementation of IDSR encounters complex barriers and opportunities within health facilities. Comprehensive strategies addressing both organizational and individual factors of healthcare facilities are needed. The CFIR framework, alongside the CFIR-ERIC matching tool, provides a foundation for identifying context-specific implementation strategies that lead to improved innovation performance. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024571576, identifier CRD42024571576.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.