Evidence mapPaperPMID 41799519Full record

ReviewOncology research2026

Advances in Targeted and Immunotherapy for High-Risk Cutaneous Malignancies.

Amy J Petty, Drew A Emge, Adela R Cardones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy J PettyDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66103, USA.
Drew A EmgeDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66103, USA.
Adela R CardonesDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide, with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and melanoma representing the most clinically significant types. While traditional treatments are effective for early-stage disease, advanced or metastatic cases often pose significant therapeutic challenges. Patients with high-risk or recurrent disease face limited options and poor prognoses. The emergence of immunotherapy has dramatically transformed the treatment landscape across multiple cancer types, including cutaneous malignancies. This review highlights recent advancements in immunotherapeutic strategies for BCC, cSCC, and melanoma, underscoring their growing importance in dermatologic oncology. We synthesize current evidence and ongoing clinical trials for immunotherapy across these three skin cancer types. We also explore the molecular mechanisms underpinning immune responsiveness and potential biomarkers of response. As immunotherapy continues to expand within dermatology, understanding its role, limitations, and future directions is essential for optimizing patient care. The integration of immunotherapy into dermatologic practice represents not only a therapeutic innovation but also a shift toward precision medicine in cutaneous oncology.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaImmunotherapyMelanomaMolecular Targeted TherapySkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Squamous Cell CarcinomaHumansbasal cell carcinomaCutaneous malignancyimmunotherapymelanomasquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41799519
PMCPMC12963654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.