Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799790›Full record

ArticleAn international journal on information fusion2025

Review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare.

Felix Krones, Umar Marikkar, Guy Parsons, Adam Szmul, Adam Mahdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in An international journal on information fusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Medical prior-guided TabMap deep learning model for ovarian cancer prediction and interpretability analysis].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felix KronesOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Umar MarikkarInstitute for People-Centred AI, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Guy ParsonsOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Adam SzmulWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Adam MahdiOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning methods in healthcare have traditionally focused on using data from a single modality, limiting their ability to effectively replicate the clinical practice of integrating multiple sources of information for improved decision making. Clinicians typically rely on a variety of data sources including patients' demographic information, laboratory data, vital signs and various imaging data modalities to make informed decisions and contextualise their findings. Recent advances in machine learning have facilitated the more efficient incorporation of multimodal data, resulting in applications that better represent the clinician's approach. Here, we provide an overview of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare, encompassing various data modalities commonly used in clinical diagnoses, such as imaging, text, time series and tabular data. We discuss key stages of model development, including pre-training, fine-tuning and evaluation. Additionally, we explore common data fusion approaches used in modelling, highlighting their advantages and performance challenges. An overview is provided of 17 multimodal clinical datasets with detailed description of the specific data modalities used in each dataset. Over 50 studies have been reviewed, with a predominant focus on the integration of imaging and tabular data. While multimodal techniques have shown potential in improving predictive accuracy across many healthcare areas, our review highlights that the effectiveness of a method is contingent upon the specific data and task at hand.

Indexed as

Data fusionDeep learningHealthcareMultimodal machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41799790
PMCPMC12961302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.