ReviewAddictive behaviors reports2026
Off-Label Medications and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) in the Treatment of Internet Gaming Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Addictive behaviors reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internet gaming disorder (IGD) has become a worldwide concern, but there are still no approved medications or treatments for IGD. The present study systematically meta-analyzed the available research regarding off-label medications and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) as neurobiological treatments for IGD. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 687; age range = 9 to 26 years) following PRISMA guidelines, and data from 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In some of the studies, IGD was a comorbid condition with major depression, alcohol use disorder, attention deficits, and/or hyperactivity disorder. The findings indicated that: (i) treatment using non-invasive neuromodulation (tDCS targeting dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]), bupropion, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and methylphenidate were significant in reducing IGD; (ii) pharmacotherapy was much more effective than tDCS; (iii) there were no significant differences between tDCS, SSRIs, and methylphenidate, and all except SSRIs were outperformed by bupropion; (iv) the effect of tDCS, bupropion, and SSRIs were independent of IGD severity; (v) the effect of bupropion was independent of treatment duration, gaming level, or comorbidity with depression; (vi) the effect of bupropion remained stable after 12 weeks follow-up; (vii) the effect of methylphenidate was independent of treatment duration; and (viii) the effect of SSRIs was independent of IGD severity and treatment duration. However, this initial evidence is limited in its generalizability due to high risk of bias, overrepresentation of males, small sample sizes, lack of clinical interviews, lack of consideration of comorbidities, lack of monitoring for side effects, and insufficient details for exact replication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.