ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Advances in intratumoral immunotherapy from a neuro-immune-endocrine perspective for breast cancer treatment.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic spontaneous cholinergic urticaria: advances in immunological mechanisms focusing on neuro-immune crosstalk and novel targeted therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Neuroimmune regulation of post-traumatic bone regeneration: focus on inflammatory switching and functional recovery.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence rate of breast cancer continues to grow worldwide and is increasingly occurring in younger women. Although treatments have improved, they present several distinct challenges, as life-threatening side effects, relapse, metastasis, and ultimately death in women and men of productive ages. The immunotherapeutic strategies are focused on the postoperative context, and the systemic intravenous therapies have shown benefits in some patient populations with overall survivor rates higher in hormone-dependent breast cancer, but still high relapse rates, especially in more aggressive cancers such as HER2+ and triple negative. To halt tumor progression, it is necessary to identify all players involved, but most importantly, acknowledge the interactions of tumor cells with their surroundings. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has emerged as a conceptual framework that underscores the collective influence of cellular, structural, and signaling elements coexisting around the tumor. These components do not merely act as passive bystanders; rather, they form a dynamic milieu that shapes tumor behavior, therapeutic responsiveness, and disease trajectory. This reinforces the notion that effective interventions must address not only malignant cells but also the broader contextual landscape in which they evolve. While intratumor refers to heterogeneity within a single tumor, the TME encompasses the surrounding non-cancerous cells, molecules, and vasculature that interact with the tumor, collectively forming a dynamic landscape that modulates therapeutic responses and disease trajectory. The neuro-immune-endocrine (NIE) network plays a complex role in breast cancer, with the nervous system influencing tumor growth, immune evasion, and metastasis through neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. The endocrine system influences the TME through hormones such as estrogens, even in non-estrogen-dependent tumors in breast cancer. At the same time, immune cells interact with both neural and endocrine components, responding through cytokine release and phenotype modulation, thereby mounting a permissive or cytotoxic response to combat tumors. Stress, which activates the sympathetic nervous system, can affect immune cells and hormone release, impacting treatment adherence and positive prognosis. Nowadays, local intratumoral delivery with diverse mechanisms of action has been shown to mitigate systemic toxic effects and ensure targeted delivery, and has progressed to clinical trials, demonstrating promising outcomes. These mechanisms include, but are not limited to, triggering immune responses using pathogens, enhancing immune responses with recombinant cytokines, inhibiting immune checkpoints with monoclonal antibodies, or combining two or more of these strategies. Despite the high mortality associated with breast cancer in aggressive subtypes and its characterization by well-defined primary lesions, the clinical application of non-systemic intratumoral chemotherapy remains limited. In this review, we summarize effective intratumoral immunotherapeutic approaches for inhibiting tumor growth and/or metastasis in breast cancer. Specifically, we focus on the interactions within the NIE network that contribute to a sustained resolution of breast cancer. By elucidating these interactions, we aim to 1) predict treatment outcomes, 2) explain why some patients do not respond to innovative therapies, and 3) propose novel strategies for modifying the TME through targeted delivery of therapeutic agents with new materials. Furthermore, this approach paves the way for tumor-targeted modulation of other potential endocrine modulators, cytokine/chemokine delivery, and neurotransmitter modulation within the TME, representing a novel frontier in cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.