ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Magnesium sulfate pharmacology for maternal and critical-care indications: mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, and the therapeutic window.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnesium Sulfate as an Analgesic and Sedative-sparing Agent in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial.Journal of research in pharmacy practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and related critical illnesses remain leading global causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity, and magnesium sulfate is now a cornerstone therapy across obstetric, perinatal, and critical-care settings. However, its use in practice remains heterogeneous. This narrative, practice-oriented review synthesizes mechanistic, pharmacologic, clinical, and implementation evidence on magnesium sulfate use in pregnancy and critical illness. We draw on mechanistic and pharmacokinetic studies, randomized and observational clinical research, guidelines, and quality-improvement reports, emphasizing literature from 2020 to 2025 and selectively incorporating earlier landmark trials and classic pharmacology papers. We describe the multi-mechanistic actions that underpin anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects, summarize pharmacokinetic variability and exposure targets, and appraise efficacy and safety across key indications, including prevention and treatment of eclampsia and severe preeclampsia, antenatal neuroprotection before very preterm birth, treatment of acute severe hypertension, and perioperative or critical-care adjunct use. We highlight how renal function, body size, and co-administered sedative or neuromuscular blocking agents shape dosing, toxicity risk, and monitoring strategies, and we contrast clinical examination-led and laboratory-led approaches to safety surveillance. At the systems level, we synthesize evidence on digital order sets, early-warning tools, remote postpartum blood pressure monitoring, and equity-stratified quality bundles designed to close gaps in timely treatment and safe monitoring, particularly in low-resource settings. Remaining gaps include precision dosing in special populations, long-term outcomes after antenatal exposure, and formal economic evaluations of care bundles that incorporate magnesium sulfate. Collectively, this review reframes magnesium sulfate as part of an integrated maternal and critical-care safety bundle and proposes a research agenda that links pharmacology, clinical trials, and implementation science to safer and more equitable use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.