ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
A novel multimodal AI-based radiomics approach for precision assessment of pain intensity in chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Rural Spine Care: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging era of robotics and artificial intelligence in orthopaedic trauma surgery.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Radiomics: Current Applications and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Integrating mechanistic research and emerging technologies to advance clinical translation in orthopaedics.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (cNLBP) is a prevalent global health concern. Radiomics enables the extraction of high-dimensional quantitative features from medical images and has shown promise in disease diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and therapeutic response evaluation. To construct and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based evaluation model for clinical symptoms in cNLBP patients, leveraging both clinical and radiomics features. The clinical utility of this approach was evaluated in identifying patients at high risk for severe pain. Methods: A total of 148 patients with cNLBP were enrolled and stratified by VAS into mild and severe pain groups. Radiomics features from the paraspinal muscles were extracted from lumbar MRI scans. Multiple AI algorithms were applied to construct evaluation models. Logistic regression was used to construct clinical models, radiomics models, and combined clinical - radiomics models, respectively, to compare the predictive power of different models. Model performance was evaluated by multiple methods. Results: Fat infiltration rate of multifidus muscles as significant predictors of pain intensity. The Bagging decision tree model and random forest model achieved higher area under the ROC curve (AUC) values and F1 scores, respectively, in radiomics models. The combined models integrating radiomics and clinical features further increased AUCs. Conclusion: AI algorithms have a significant advantage over traditional algorithms in improving the performance of predictive models. Integrating radiomics features with clinical variables significantly enhances the predictive performance for pain intensity in cNLBP. Multimodal data integration compensates for the limitations of single-modality models, improving both accuracy and stability. The translational potential of this article: This study facilitates early risk stratification of cNLBP patients in clinical practice, enabling clinicians to prioritize intervention for high-risk individuals and optimize the allocation of medical resources. Moreover, the validated high-performance AI models and the multimodal integration strategy lay a foundation for the development of clinical auxiliary tools. Such tools can be integrated into existing clinical workflows to assist clinicians in accurately identifying patients with severe pain at high risk, thereby supporting early intervention and personalized treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.