Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800415›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Plant-soil-microbiome interactions: mechanisms, advances, and challenges in sustainable agriculture and healthy agroecosystems.

Jacek Panek, Agata Gryta, Wiktoria Maj, Mateusz Mącik, Karolina Oszust, Giorgia Pertile, Michał Pylak, Dominika Siegieda, Moritz Hallama, Ryusuke Hatano and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deciphering Stress Resilience in Black Pepper (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jacek PanekInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Agata GrytaInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Wiktoria MajInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Mateusz MącikInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Karolina OszustInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Giorgia PertileInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Michał PylakInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Dominika SiegiedaInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Moritz HallamaSoil Biology Department, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ryusuke HatanoResearch Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ellen KandelerSoil Biology Department, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Shamina Imran PathanDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giacomo PietramellaraDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Eligio MalusaThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, Skierniewice, Poland.
Jerzy WeberWroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Katarzyna TurnauInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Kraków, Poland.
Sylwia RóżalskaDepartment of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Magdalena FrącInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The focus of this article is to summarize current knowledge of plant-associated microbiomes, which play a key role in plant health and in maintaining soil quality. Such microbiomes, comprising bacteria, fungi, archaea, algae, nematodes, and protists, perform various functions, including nutrient transformation, pathogen protection, and stress mitigation. Microbial communities are commonly used as an indicator of ecosystem health. Soil microbiome diversity depends on environmental factors (including biotic and abiotic stresses), which can alter microbial composition, thereby modifying microbial interactions and plant resilience. Biofertilizers, biopreparations, and microbial inoculants or consortia have been utilized in agriculture to enhance soil properties, such as microbial diversity and enzymatic activity, and to prime plant immune responses, thereby promoting plant growth and health. Biofertilizers can significantly help plants adapt to environmental stresses and climate change, mitigating drought stress and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies, the computing power available to scientists, and the development of bioinformatics tools have made microbial community studies widely accessible. These tools enable the research and modeling of changes in the soil microbiome, plant disease susceptibility, and soil health. Multi-omics approaches to microbiomes are key to characterizing the microbiome and predicting plant diseases. Future research should focus primarily on understanding the interactions among soil, plants, and microbiomes. This approach will help develop climate-resilient plants and improve the health and functionality of agroecosystems. Key efforts closely aligned with the European Union's goals and biodiversity strategies for sustainable agriculture and soil health restoration, as presented in this review, include studying the structures and functions of soil microbiomes, developing new assays, and designing and investigating microbial consortia to restore healthy communities. These strategies address contemporary challenges in agriculture, including vertical and urban farming and superfood production.

Indexed as

biodiversityclimate changemicrobiomesplant resilienceregenerative agriculturesoil functionalitysoil health

Identifiers

PMID41800415
PMCPMC12962961

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.