ArticleMedical education online2026
Confirming and notifying death: blended learning acceptability among medical students, a pilot mixed-methods study.
Article in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young doctors confronted with death confirmation and death notification experience practical and emotional difficulties. The medical curriculum does not provide any specific training on these tasks. On clinical placements, exposure to death is rare and late. Death notification conditions the relatives' grieving process. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived acceptability of specific training on these topics by students in their last year of medical school. The participants followed a specifically designed e-learning course that provided theoretical elements, then participated in a simulation session on death notification. In this mixed-methods study, acceptability was explored quantitatively using self-questionnaires before and after the training, and then qualitatively through focus groups. Fourteen students were included. The study showed a significant improvement in self-efficacy as well as a positive impact on the seven components of acceptability. The students emphasized the complementary nature of the teaching methods and the unexpected contributions to interprofessional skills. The participants were pleased with this teaching approach and the topics covered. They expressed a need for more teaching on interpersonal skills and emotion management, which is currently neglected by the medical school curriculum. Clinical experience insufficiently enriches the curriculum, which could benefit from more mentoring and interprofessional collaboration. This innovative theoretical and practical training is perceived as acceptable by students and deserves to be enhanced and made permanent. Future work should explore its impact on clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.