Evidence mapPaperPMID 41801108Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2026

Challenges and expectations on the use of automated home cage monitoring for advancing laboratory animal care and welfare.

Jordi L Tremoleda, Aurora Brønstad, Heidrun Potschka, Petra Seebeck, Oliver Stiedl, Vootele Voikar, Sara Wells, TEATIME Animal Welfare Subgroup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jordi L TremoledaBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-9043
Aurora BrønstadDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-5425
Heidrun PotschkaInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1506-0252
Petra SeebeckZurich Integrative Rodent Physiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver StiedlVrije Universiteit Amsterdam & Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4427-9221
Vootele VoikarHelsinki Institute of Life Science, Laboratory Animal Centre, University of Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4201-8666
Sara WellsMary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxford, UK.
TEATIME Animal Welfare Subgroup

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COST Action TEATIME unites experts to advance automated monitoring technologies for laboratory animals, with a focus on Home Cage Monitoring (HCM) systems. The use of HCM has great potential to revolutionise welfare monitoring by enabling continuous, non-invasive tracking of physiological and behavioural patterns in group-housed animals within their undisturbed housing environment. These systems capture spontaneous behaviours - such as feeding, grooming, social interactions and sleep cycles - across day and night phases, offering objective data for welfare and scientific assessments. This real-time monitoring might allow for early detection of distress, disease progression and subtle welfare changes, supporting timely interventions and refined humane endpoints. Unlike traditional clinical scoring, which relies on brief daily observations, HCM provides longitudinal, individualised insights and reduces observer bias. It might also facilitate better characterisation of positive affective states, contributing to more holistic welfare evaluations. Despite technological progress, challenges remain in data integration, sensitivity and standardisation across facilities. Effective implementation requires real-time alert capabilities, robust data management, and interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists, veterinarians and data experts. HCM systems should complement - not replace - human expertise, enriching welfare monitoring and scientific reproducibility. Their integration can improve husbandry, refine severity assessments, advancing both animal welfare and scientific replicability.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimals, LaboratoryAnimal WelfareAutomationHousing, AnimalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBehaviourethics and welfarehome cage systemshumane endpointsrefinementwelfare assessments

Identifiers

PMID41801108
PMCPMC13031348

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.