Evidence mapPaperPMID 41801195Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2026

Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence After the Inflation Reduction Act.

Lucas X Marinacci, Stephen Mein, Benjamin N Rome, Rishi K Wadhera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas X MarinacciRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephen MeinRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin N RomeProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rishi K WadheraRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Training Program in Cardiovascular ResearchT32HL160522 · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · 2025 to 2025
$555k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL160522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: High prescription drug costs are a pressing national concern and contribute to medication nonadherence and poor health outcomes. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) introduced sweeping reforms to improve medication affordability, but their potential impact on medication adherence is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association of the IRA's 2024 prescription drug provisions with cost-related medication nonadherence as well as health care-related financial strain. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis used data from the 2021-2024 National Health Interview Survey. Adults aged 62 to 67 years who were enrolled in Medicare Part D (intervention) or private insurance (comparator) were included. Individuals with incomes 135% or less of the federal poverty level, dually enrolled in Medicaid, and who currently used insulin were excluded from the primary analysis because preexisting protections limited their out-of-pocket spending in Medicare. Exposures: The IRA's prescription drug provisions were enacted on January 1, 2024, including (1) elimination of the 5% coinsurance requirement for catastrophic coverage that effectively capped out-of-pocket drug costs to approximately $3300 per year and (2) expansion of full low-income subsidies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was cost-related medication nonadherence. The secondary outcome was health care-related financial strain. Results: The study population included 1454 Medicare beneficiaries (weighted mean [SD] age, 66.1 [0.8] years; 53.1% female) and 3797 privately insured comparators (weighted mean [SD] age, 63.3 [1.2] years; 50.7% female). Prior to the 2024 IRA reforms, trends in cost-related medication nonadherence were parallel between the 2 groups. Following implementation of the IRA's 2024 provisions, cost-related medication nonadherence declined among Medicare beneficiaries relative to comparators (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate, -4.9 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -8.8 to -1.0 pp). Among Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions, the decline was more pronounced (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate, -7.8 pp; 95% CI, -12.9 to -2.8 pp). These findings were robust across multiple sensitivity analyses as well as secondary analyses using Medicare beneficiaries with incomes 135% or less of the federal poverty level and dually enrolled in Medicaid as an alternative comparator group. In contrast, there were no meaningful differential changes observed for health care-related financial strain (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate, -2.6 pp; 95% CI, -10.1 to 5.0 pp). Conclusions and Relevance: In this difference-in-differences analysis, the IRA's 2024 prescription drug provisions were associated with a reduction in cost-related medication nonadherence among eligible Medicare beneficiaries in their first year. These early improvements may have important implications for chronic disease management and downstream clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug CostsDrug MonitoringHealth ExpendituresPrescription DrugsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedicare Part DMiddle AgedUnited StatesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID41801195
PMCPMC12973215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.