ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in emergency gastrointestinal procedures: a review of current evidence and future directions.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal emergency surgeries have a high rate of morbidity and mortality due to diagnostic inaccuracies, urgent decision-making, and physiological instability of patients. While robotic surgery and artificial intelligence (AI) have become well-established in elective procedures, their application in emergency gastrointestinal surgery remains an emerging field. This study is presented as a narrative review due to the heterogeneity of available study designs, study populations, the used technologies and reported outcomes. A literature search was performed across relevant databases. Data were summarized narratively across key areas, including emergency triage, predictive analytics for sepsis and postoperative complications, preoperative planning, intraoperative AI-assisted anatomical recognition, and clinical outcomes. Current evidence indicates that robotic surgery is feasible and safe in selected emergency gastrointestinal conditions, such as acute cholecystitis, perforated peptic ulcers, and diverticulitis. AI technologies have shown promise in improving diagnostic accuracy and decision-making during surgical procedures. However, widespread adoption is limited by high costs, institutional requirements, and concerns regarding algorithm transparency. In conclusion, AI-assisted robotic surgery shows considerable potential to enhance outcomes in emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Nevertheless, further validation and structured implementation are necessary before routine clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801293What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.