Trial reportLasers in medical science2026
Efficacy and safety analysis of LenSX and Catalys femtosecond laser systems in short axial length patients.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compared femtosecond laser time, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), fluid perfusion volume, and changes in corneal endothelial cell quantity in short-axial-length cataract patients treated with LenSx and Catalys femtosecond laser systems. A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial included 100 eyes of short axial length patients. They were randomly assigned to different femtosecond laser pretreatment protocols before cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Data like age, LOCS III grade, and corneal endothelial counts were collected. The two groups had similar preoperative features. Except for femtosecond laser time, there were no statistically significant differences in CDE, EPT, fluid perfusion, and corneal endothelial counts. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the two groups. LenSx had more capsule edge problems, while Catalys might affect surgeons. Catalys exhibited shorter laser times in softer cataracts and greater variability in denser cases. LenSx demonstrated stable laser performance across cataract densities. These observations suggest the potential for tailored device selection for short-axial-length patients, but confirmation requires subgroup analyses with larger sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.