SynthesisCardiovascular toxicology2026
Cardiotoxic Effects of Osimertinib Compared to Other EGFR Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, was developed to overcome resistance from EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While it offers significant therapeutic benefits, reports have linked Osimertinib to cardiotoxic effects. This study aims to clarify the direct cardiotoxicity of Osimertinib by reviewing clinical trials and cohort studies involving Osimertinib monotherapy compared to other EGFR inhibitors. A search was conducted in online databases. Measured outcomes included risk of heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), arrhythmias, and pericardial effusion. These outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with a random effects model using 95% confidence intervals (CI). Five studies with 19,008 patients (age 68 ± 13, 65% female) were selected. Osimertinib therapy was associated with an increased risk of HF (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.19-1.76, p = 0.0002), decline in LVEF (RR = 3.10, 95% CI 1.72-5.59, p = 0.0002) and MI (RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.79, p = 0.0078) compared to other EGFR inhibitors. There was no difference in the risk of arrhythmias and pericardial effusion. Osimertinib therapy is associated with an increased risk of HF and a decline in LVEF compared to other EGFR inhibitors, while associations with MI and arrhythmias were less consistent. Although these events are infrequent, their potential severity warrants proactive cardiac monitoring for patients receiving Osimertinib, particularly in patients with pre-existing risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.