SynthesisOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Visual and Oculomotor Function in Developmental Dyslexia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
topicTo determine whether individuals with developmental dyslexia present differences in visual and oculomotor functions compared with age-matched controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Developmental dyslexia affects a substantial proportion of school-aged children, with prevalence estimates ranging between 3% and 6%, depending on diagnostic criteria. It is characterised by persistent reading difficulties despite normal intelligence and education. Although phonological deficits are well established, the contribution of visual and oculomotor anomalies remains debated. Identifying consistent visual differences may support more comprehensive assessments and targeted interventions alongside educational strategies.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis, registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251119429), included observational case-control studies comparing visual and oculomotor functions in individuals with developmental dyslexia and age-matched controls. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Outcomes included binocular vision, oculomotor performance, accommodation, visual acuity, refractive error and contrast sensitivity. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS tool and certainty of evidence using GRADE.
resultsTwenty-six studies with 8 to 124 participants per group were included. Dyslexic individuals showed significantly greater near exophoria (mean difference 0.84 prism diopters, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.46) and reduced near fusional vergence ranges, including negative (-6.42 prism diopters, 95% CI: -8.65 to -4.19) and positive fusional vergence (-6.72 prism diopters, 95% CI: -8.66 to -4.77), all p < 0.01. Oculomotor differences included a higher number of fixations, longer fixation duration, more regressions and reduced saccade amplitude. No significant group differences were found for refractive error or visual acuity.
conclusionsChildren with developmental dyslexia exhibit consistent binocular and oculomotor anomalies that may increase visual effort during reading. Incorporating targeted assessment of these functions into vision care may complement multidisciplinary management. Further research is needed to clarify their clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.