ArticlePloS one2026
Study protocol for the development of a digital menstrual cycle diary for routine mental health and gynecological care: A human-centered design approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPremenstrual disorders, including premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and premenstrual exacerbation of psychiatric disorders affect a significant portion of reproductive-age females. Accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment are often constrained by the limitations of traditional paper-based symptom diaries. These diaries lack flexibility for personalized symptom tracking and fail to capture treatment-relevant factors such as lifestyle and social events. A digital, adaptable symptom diary is therefore needed. In this paper, we present the protocol for the CycleWise study. This study is a multi-method study aimed at developing a digital menstrual cycle diary within PETRA (PErsonalized Treatment by Real-time Assessment), an ESM-based tool previously designed to support treatment in routine mental health care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following a human-centered design approach and the Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research roadmap, patients and clinicians will be involved throughout all phases to ensure the tool meets their needs. In the contextual inquiry phase, we will identify stakeholders and analyze current practices. The value specification phase will focus on assessing stakeholder needs through two focus groups and translating them into functional requirements. A user experience designer will then develop a prototype in the design phase, refining it iteratively based on stakeholder feedback. Implementation strategies will be formulated in the operationalization phase. Finally, uptake, impact and working mechanisms will be evaluated through qualitative interviews and quantitative measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.