Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801926›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Prevalence and associated factors of health facility delivery during COVID-19 in the Tamale Metropolis of Ghana: Analytical cross-sectional study.

Obed Kwaku Duah Asumadu, Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro, Joyce Aputere Ndago, David Abatanie Kanligi, Martin Nyaaba Adokiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Obed Kwaku Duah AsumaduDepartment of Social and Behavioural Change, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
Gilbert Abotisem AbiiroDepartment of Health Services, Policy, Planning, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
Joyce Aputere NdagoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Change, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
David Abatanie KanligiPediatric Unit, Savelugu Municipal Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Northern Region, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-3097
Martin Nyaaba AdokiyaDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0167-5512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the provision of maternal health services, especially facility-based delivery. However, there is little evidence on the proportion of women who delivered at the health facility in various locations and the factors that influenced women's decision-making in choosing a place of delivery during and amid the COVID-19 restrictions. Therefore, this study assessed the prevalence and factors associated with health facility delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Tamale Metropolis of Ghana.

methodsAn analytical cross-sectional study design was conducted. A multistage sampling technique was used in selecting the study communities. At the individual level, random sampling technique was applied, and 461 women were recruited from 21st February 2021-21st March 2021. Using a questionnaire, a face-to-face approach was used to conduct the interviews. The questionnaire included questions on socio-demographic characteristics, place of childbirth and factors that led to the choice of delivery place. Using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25, descriptive and binary logistic regression analysis were conducted.

resultsThe results revealed that 64.0% of the women delivered in health facilities during the pandemic. Health facility delivery was more likely to occur among women with higher educational status (AOR: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.40-19.40), married women (AOR:6.3; 95% C.I:1.10-35.80), active National Health Insurance Scheme holders during delivery (AOR: 13.8; 95% C.I: 4.60-41.90), women who received education on birth preparedness and complication readiness (AOR: 7.6; 95% C.I:3.30-17.50) and women with underlying conditions before pregnancy (AOR:3.3; 95% C.I:1.20-9.20). There were reduced odds of health facility delivery among women with a history of home delivery (AOR:0.2; 95% C.I:0.10-0.50), when the mother-in-law decides on the place of delivery (AOR:0.1; 95% C.I:0.03-0.50), longer distance to the place of delivery (AOR:0.3; 95% C.I:0.01-1.00) and when women perceived COVID-19 as a barrier to facility delivery (AOR:0.1; 95% C.I:0.03-0.20).

conclusionOur findings show that health facility delivery declined during COVID-19. Factors that affected health facility delivery were educational status, marriage, having an active National Health Insurance Scheme, education on birth preparedness and complication readiness, underlying conditions before pregnancy, history of home delivery, mother-in-law decision on place of delivery, distance to place of delivery and perceiving COVID-19 as a barrier to facility delivery. These contributed to low facility delivery. Thus, maternal health services need to be brought to the doorsteps of communities, including proper implementation of the Focused Antenatal Care and community-based pregnancy school programmes, especially during future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery, ObstetricHealth FacilitiesMaternal Health ServicesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansPandemicsPregnancyPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41801926
PMCPMC12970876

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.