ArticlePloS one2026
Research on epilepsy detection methods based on interpretable features and machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- XGBoost Classification of Epileptic EEG Using Nonlinear Dynamical Features and SHAP.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological condition that impacts a significant number of individuals worldwide. Patients' physical and mental health, as well as their daily activities, are significantly affected by seizures, necessitating prompt diagnosis and treatment. The automatic detection of epilepsy using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has been a significant area of research. Nevertheless, the majority of current methods are based on intricate feature engineering processes that require the extraction and selection of a large number of features to identify the most discriminative feature sets. This results in a high level of algorithmic complexity, inadequate robustness, and inadequate interpretability, which complicates the provision of theoretical support to clinicians. This paper proposes a pathophysiology-driven, interpretable machine learning algorithm to address the limitations of current EEG-based epilepsy detection methods, which include poor interpretability and complex feature engineering. We developed a low-dimensional, interpretable feature combination consisting of only five features and systematically validated its discriminative capability across various epilepsy phases by innovatively integrating electrophysiological markers of epileptic seizures with nonlinear dynamical properties. In the binary classification of seizure versus non-seizure EEG segments, the XGB classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 98.73% and an F1 score of 98.57%. Classification accuracy for interictal versus ictal periods reached 95.33%, with an F1 score of 95.27%. In the challenging ternary classification task encompassing preictal, interictal, and ictal periods, the model achieved a respectable accuracy of 86.3% and an F1 score of 85.79%. Cross-database validation yielded a maximum accuracy of 82.17% and an F1 score of 81.99%, confirming the proposed features' robust generalization capability and transformative potential. This feature set exhibits outstanding and stable performance across all models, as demonstrated by evaluations across two public datasets using five machine learning classifiers. In addition, SHAP values quantified the contribution of each feature to predictions, thereby providing a transparent decision-making rationale that substantially improves the algorithm's interpretability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.