ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Burst firing creates an attractor in synaptic weight dynamics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two-factor synaptic plasticity enables memory consolidation during neuronal burst firing.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural circuits often alternate between tonic and burst firing, two distinct activity regimes that reflect changes in excitability and neuromodulatory state. While tonic firing produces asynchronous spikes driven by diverse external inputs, collective burst firing consists of rapid clusters of spikes followed by a period of silence, happening synchronously within the network. Synaptic plasticity has typically been studied only in either one of these regimes, leaving unclear how their distinct plasticity dynamics can be combined when circuits alternate between regimes. Here, we use a conductance-based network model endowed with calcium-based or spike-timing-based plasticity rules to examine how synaptic weights evolve across tonic and burst firing regimes. During tonic firing, synaptic weights are driven by the statistics of external inputs, producing a broad distribution across the network. In contrast, during collective burst firing, weights converge to a narrow region in weight space: a burst-induced attractor. We derive the location of this attractor analytically in terms of plasticity parameters and activity statistics, and confirm its emergence across diverse plasticity rules. The attractor reflects the synchronization of plasticity-driving signals during bursts, which homogenizes synaptic dynamics and forces convergence toward shared fixed points. We further show that neuromodulation and synaptic tagging can shift or split the burst-induced attractor, stabilizing selected synapses while weakening others. Together, these results identify burst-induced attractors as a robust emergent property of collective bursting. Alternation between tonic and burst firing provides a biologically plausible context in which heterogeneous, input-driven synaptic configurations formed during tonic activity can be selectively consolidated or down-selected by the burst-induced attractor during subsequent bursts. By showing how they can be analytically predicted and experimentally modulated, our work provides a general computational framework linking firing state transitions, synaptic plasticity, and memory organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.