ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2026
Off to a good start: current gaps and priorities in early-life microbiome research.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early-life microbial exposures are essential for optimal development of human physiology. Yet, understanding of the human microbiome during pregnancy and childhood is still far from being complete. To identify knowledge gaps and establish research priorities, a multidisciplinary expert panel used the Delphi method for consensus development and conducted a literature search on early-life microbiome determinants. Responses from 55 researchers from an online survey were analyzed alongside keyword frequency from 20 501 publications. This approach enabled us to categorize existing evidence and highlight areas requiring investigation. While the main routes for mother-to-child bacterial transmission and their contributions to the newborn microbiome have been studied, many gaps remain. Priority areas include non-bacterial microbes, ecological principles of colonization, environmental and social influences, body sites beyond the gut, and factors affecting the maternal microbiome and its effects on the child's microbiome. Significance of factors such as hygiene habits, non-antibiotic medications, and pollution remains to be uncovered. Knowledge is also limited on postnatal microbial sharing via household contacts and shared environments (e.g. family members, peers) and the contribution of these pathways to microbiome assembly. We hope this report will guide and inspire future research into the early-life microbiome as a modifiable factor in reducing disease risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.