ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Development and Evaluation of SNOMED CT Automated Mapping Tool: Advancing Terminology Standardization and Semantic Interoperability.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are Traditional Registries Becoming Obsolete in the Modern Digital Health Ecosystem?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective secondary use of healthcare data is hindered by fragmentation and a lack of semantic interoperability due to heterogeneous local terminologies. Standardizing clinical terms using SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms) is essential but remains a manual, labor-intensive, and inconsistent process, especially across multiple institutions. Automated, scalable solutions are needed to support reliable mapping and new concept authoring for large-scale research.
objectiveWe aimed to develop a large language model (LLM)-assisted tool that streamlines SNOMED CT terminology mapping and concept authoring, which enables seamless, standardized data integration across multi-institutional clinical datasets.
methodsThe mapping pipeline included preprocessing local terms, syntactic and LLM-based vector similarity mapping, and iterative enrichment based on validated results. Translation and semantic representation used GPT-4o (OpenAI). New concepts were authored through a structured postcoordination process, and both the efficiency and quality of authoring (including duplicate rate and Machine Readable Concept Model validation violations) were quantitatively evaluated. Performance was evaluated using diagnostic and surgical procedural terms from 4 major hospital networks (9 university hospitals) in South Korea, with additional usability feedback gathered from clinical terminologists.
resultsUsing reference terms, top-5 accuracy for diagnostic mapping reached 98.7%, 89.7%, 98.5%, and 92.8% across the 4 institutions and 99.2%, 82.6%, 98.7%, and 84.7% for surgical procedural mapping. Implementation of the tool reduced manual mapping rates by 30% and overall manual workload by up to 90%. The proposed tool reduced average mapping and new concept creation time by approximately 75%, while decreasing the final mapping table processing time by 90%. New concept authoring errors also decreased, with duplicate concepts reduced by 83% and modeling rule violations by 72%.
conclusionsThis study developed and validated an automated, LLM-assisted SNOMED CT mapping tool that significantly improved efficiency, mapping accuracy, and new concept quality. Limitations include technical integration challenges and dependency on translation quality. Future directions involve leveraging SNOMED CT's ontology structure and knowledge graphs, enhancing sustainability through ongoing maintenance and quality assurance, and further advancing new concept authoring with automated Machine Readable Concept Model rule enforcement and inactivation processes to achieve robust and scalable terminology standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.