ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Neural Mechanisms of Shooting Preparation Under High-Risk and High-Precision Tasks: A Multiscale EEG Study.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring the shooting-preparation phase, shooters frequently encounter multiple interfering factors, such as task load, social evaluation, and complex environments. These factors can induce intricate changes in neural activity, leading to variations in shooting performance. This study aims to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying brain activity during the shooting preparation phase in high-risk tasks (e.g., Hostage-Rescue Condition) and high-precision tasks (e.g., Long-Range Condition).
methodsElectroencephalographic (EEG) signals, the shooting performance metrics, and the self-report measures were collected from 30 shooters who completed shooting tasks under three conditions: Hostage-Rescue Condition, Long-Range Condition, and Close-Range Condition. EEG signals were subjected to sensor-level spectral analysis, source-level spectral analysis, functional connectivity analysis, and graph-theoretic analysis.
resultsCompared with Close-Range Condition, shooters exhibited the following characteristics during Hostage-Rescue Condition and Long-Range Condition: (1) perceived pressure increased significantly; however, shooting score and aiming time improved significantly only in the Hostage-Rescue Condition; (2) significant differences were observed across multiple frequency bands and brain regions. Sensor-level spectral analysis revealed the greatest number of significant differences in beta-band event-related desynchronization/synchronization across conditions. Source-space analysis indicated that the theta band exhibited the highest number of significant differences across conditions; (3) functional connectivity between the frontal lobe and other lobes weakened significantly, whereas intra-lobar connectivity strengthened significantly. In addition, small-worldness increased, but the clustering coefficient and global efficiency decreased significantly.
conclusionUnder Hostage-Rescue Condition and Long-Range Condition, shooters perceived greater pressure, yet the shooting score improved only under Hostage-Rescue Condition. Intra-lobar functional connectivity strengthened, whereas connectivity between the frontal lobe and other lobes was suppressed. Nodal clustering coefficients increased in vision-related regions but decreased in semantically related regions. These changes indicate that, when confronting Hostage-rescue and Long-Range Conditions, the brain achieves adaptive regulation by redistributing neural resources to optimize information-processing efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.