ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026
Attitudes toward climate change risk among older people: new evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study investigates the diversity of attitudes toward climate change risk (ACCR) among older adults in England. This demographic, both vulnerable to climate impacts and influential in shaping climate policy, has often been overlooked in terms of its specific ACCR. The study aims to identify distinct attitudinal profiles and explore the sociodemographic, economic, health, and civic factors associated with them.
methodsUsing data from Wave 11 (2023-2024) of the nationally representative English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, we analyzed responses from 6,572 individuals aged 50 and older. Latent class analysis was employed to identify typologies of ACCR based on 6 climate-related statements. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations between class membership and individual characteristics.
resultsFive distinct ACCR profiles were identified: "Highly engaged with climate change risk" (30.3%), "Engaged with CCR" (31.3%), "Risk-aware but fatalistic" (11.1%), "Ambivalent/uncertain about CCR" (21.5%), and "CCR dismissive" (5.8%). Younger age, higher education, greater financial resources, and higher levels of public engagement were associated with a higher likelihood of being "Highly engaged" about climate change. Conversely, lower education, economic hardship, and lack of civic engagement were linked to "ambivalent/uncertain" attitudes. Notably, older adults were more likely to be risk-aware but fatalistic. DISCUSSION: Contrary to common assumptions, most older adults are engaged with CCR, but there is notable heterogeneity, with ∼27% reporting ambivalent/uncertain, or dismissive views. Inclusive and effective climate policy should recognize this diversity, employing outreach and communication strategies that stress personal relevance and actionable solutions, especially targeting those with ambivalent/uncertain views.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.