Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803106›Full record

ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2026

Computational variant predictors for pharmacogenomics: from evaluation of single alleles to assessment of adverse drug reactions to antidepressants.

Jacek Hajto, Marcin Piechota, Ilse Krätschmer, Paula Konowalska, Gabriel E Boyle, Douglas M Fowler, Malgorzata Borczyk, Michal Korostynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacek HajtoLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Department of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-4246
Marcin PiechotaLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Department of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.
Ilse KrätschmerInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5636-9259
Paula KonowalskaLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Department of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.
Gabriel E BoyleDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-5787
Douglas M FowlerDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Malgorzata Borczyk *Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Department of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland. gosborcz@if-pan.krakow.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-4304-8384
Michal Korostynski *Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Department of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland. malgorzata.m.borczyk@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4273-7401

Funding

The Center for Actionable Variant Analysis; measuring variant function at scaleUM1HG011969 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Douglas M Fowler, Lea Starita · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
New approaches for investigating the causes and consequences of cellular heterogeneityR35GM152106 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Douglas M Fowler · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG011969NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152106Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, pharmacogenetics relies on partially annotated star alleles, leaving novel variants and complex haplotypes uninterpretable. Computational scoring frameworks could overcome these limitations. Here, we comprehensively evaluated the ability of existing (CADD, FATHMM-XF, PROVEAN, MutationAssessor, SIFT, PhyloP100, APF, APF2) and novel (PharmGScore and PharmMLScore) variant effect predictors to assess pharmacogenetic alleles in multiple scenarios. Altogether we analyzed 541 PharmVar alleles, high‑throughput CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 mutational maps, and 200 642 UK Biobank exomes linked with health records containing antidepressant treatment outcomes. Many evaluated tools, especially ensemble frameworks, matched or exceeded star allele classifications (ROC‑AUC up to 0.85 for allele definitions, 0.95 in vitro; TPR up to 0.99 for exomes) and accurately predicted severe antidepressant adverse events for carriers of deleterious variants in CYP2C19 (OR 1.20-1.35). Our findings show that computational predictors deliver star allele accuracy while overcoming their limitations. With additional validation, computational tools could enhance clinical decision frameworks by enabling continuous scoring, incorporating previously unknown variants, and providing genome-wide applicability.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsComputational BiologyDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic VariantsAllelesCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9HumansAntidepressive AgentsCYP2C19 protein, humanCYP2C9 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9

Identifiers

PMID41803106
PMCPMC12971486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.