Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803150›Full record

ReviewNPJ systems biology and applications2026

Mathematical modeling of planar cell polarity: principles, approaches, and open questions.

Mohd Suhail Rizvi, Mohit Kumar Jolly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohd Suhail RizviDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi Sangareddy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. suhailr@bme.iith.ac.in.
Mohit Kumar JollyDepartment of Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad Seed grantSERB SRG/2021/001020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planar cell polarity represents a fundamental mechanism by which cells within epithelial sheets align their orientation, enabling coordinated tissue morphogenesis and function. Disruption of PCP leads to developmental defects and disease, highlighting the importance of understanding its establishment and maintenance. While experimental studies have identified key protein molecules that drive PCP, mathematical and computational modeling have become indispensable in connecting molecular interactions to tissue-level outcomes. Over the last couple of decades, diverse approaches, such as agent-based models, Cellular Potts frameworks, Petri nets, continuum theories, and phenomenological models, have been developed to capture distinct aspects of PCP dynamics. These frameworks allow systematic exploration of nonlinear feedback, intracellular and intercellular signaling, and the influence of geometry and mechanics, and noise on polarization. This review summarizes these mathematical and computational developments in PCP modeling, emphasizing methodological assumptions, insights gained, and open challenges. By bridging experiment and theory, PCP modeling advances both mechanistic understanding and predictive capacity for tissue-scale organization.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityModels, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMorphogenesisSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID41803150
PMCPMC13100149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.