Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803418›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026

Defining Moderate Disease and Progression in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Expert Framework to Unlock the Window of Opportunity for Prompt Treatment.

Antonio Martorell, John R Ingram, Christopher J Sayed, Falk G Bechara, Martina L Porter, Thrasyvoulos Tzellos, Haley B Naik, Brian Kirby, Kelsey R van Straalen, John W Frew and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Antonio Martorell *Inflammatory Diseases Unit, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Surgery, Hospital de Manises, Avenida Generalitat 50, 46940, Valencia, Spain. antmarto@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-1590
John R Ingram *Division of Infection and Immunity, Department of Dermatology and Academic Wound Healing, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Christopher J SayedDepartment of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Falk G BecharaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Martina L PorterBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Thrasyvoulos TzellosDepartment of Dermatology, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.
Haley B NaikDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian KirbyDepartment of Dermatology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Kelsey R van StraalenDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John W FrewUniversity of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
Ivette AlarconNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Valeria Jordan MNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Amit GargNorthwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of a therapeutic window of opportunity, defined as the period from symptom onset during which treatment initiation yields the most favorable patient outcomes, is applied in routine clinical practice across a range of inflammatory conditions. It has become an increasingly important area of interest in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a disease in which recurrent inflammation and accumulating damage can lead to irreversible destruction of skin architecture. Biologic therapies, aiming to suppress the inflammatory burden and prevent disease progression, are currently only permitted in moderate to severe HS. However, as there is no consensus definition of moderate disease, physicians may face uncertainty about when to consider or switch biologic therapy. To identify the boundaries of the window of opportunity within HS, global HS experts have developed frameworks for defining moderate HS and disease progression. It is proposed that prompt medical treatment should be administered to patients with moderate HS, defined as patients with inadequate control of HS symptoms on conventional therapies, or one inflamed skin tunnel (draining/non-draining), or four or more inflammatory lesions (including inflammatory nodules and abscesses) involving two or more anatomic areas. Furthermore, the proposed definition for disease progression is the development of one or more new tunnel(s) and/or the extension of existing tunnels, or development of one or more persistent HS lesions in an anatomical region not previously affected, or any increase in the number of persistent HS lesions in an affected anatomical region. The proposed frameworks aim to provide practical advice to physicians and support targeting the window of opportunity during routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsHidradenitis SuppurativaTime-to-TreatmentConsensusDisease ProgressionHumansSeverity of Illness IndexSkinTreatment OutcomeBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID41803418
PMCPMC13032953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.