ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and cancer risk: the good, the bad and the unknown.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Papillary thyroid carcinoma discovered in a patient on semaglutide therapy for metabolic syndrome: a case presentation and review of current evidence.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
- Clinical Implications of Mounjaro (Tirzepatide) for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) are widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and, at higher doses, obesity. Both T2DM and obesity are associated with a higher risk of cancer, which can be reduced by intentional weight loss, whereas effects of a reduction in hyperglycaemia are uncertain. GLP1RAs might have further direct effects, either beneficial or detrimental, on the development of specific malignancies. Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggests heterogeneous effects of GLP1RAs on cancer risk: the incidence of hepatocellular, oesophageal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancers might be reduced, whereas safety concerns persist with respect to thyroid (both medullary and non-medullary) carcinomas. Conversely, initial concerns on the risk of pancreatic cancer have not been confirmed. Nonetheless, the interpretation of current data is limited by detection and prescription biases in observational studies as well as insufficient follow-up and number of events in randomized trials. In this Review, we summarize current preclinical and clinical evidence, showing that the risk-benefit profile of GLP1RAs remains favourable in individuals with T2DM and obesity, although caution is warranted in those with a low cardiometabolic risk, for whom the potential risks of cancer might outweigh any expected benefits; conversely, the potential use of GLP1RAs as adjuvant therapies for certain forms of cancer needs to be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41803464What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.