ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable machine learning based decision tree model for predicting obstructive airway disease in a large non-smoking health screening population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Patient Panel Assignment Strategy to Balance Provider Workload in Family Medicine.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning versus traditional regression models for predicting diabetic retinopathy screening adherence among community-dwelling older adults with diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive airway disease is defined by reduced FEV₁ and an FEV₁/FVC ratio below 70%. While pulmonary function testing is essential, few studies have used demographic, biochemical, and lifestyle data to predict disease risk in non-smoker group. This study aimed to develop interpretable machine learning (ML) models for early risk prediction and clinical screening. We analyzed data from 81,055 non-smoking individuals drawn from a health screening cohort of 549,825 participants. Six ML algorithms including CART, RF, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Lasso were applied to develop predictive models. All models demonstrated strong predictive performance, and an ensemble feature aggregation approach was used to identify key predictors. A CART was built with the identified features to generate a visualized decision tree, generating decision rules to support clinical screening. The key predictors included age, waist-to-hip ratio, blood pressure, and biochemical markers. This is the first large-scale ML study predicting obstructive airway disease in non-smoker group using health exam data. Interpretable models may assist early detection and clinical risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.