Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803956›Full record

SynthesisHealth research policy and systems2026

Participatory systems mapping: a review of population health research practice.

Carolyn Blake, Benjamin P Rigby, Martin White, Kirstin R Mitchell, Sharon A Simpson, Nigel Gilbert, Roxanne Armstrong-Moore, Petra S Meier, Alexandra Penn, Mohammad Hassannezhad and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carolyn BlakeSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. carolyn.blake@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7231-4290
Benjamin P RigbyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6997-5194
Martin WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-6757
Kirstin R MitchellSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4409-6601
Sharon A SimpsonSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-1768
Nigel GilbertCentre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5937-2410
Roxanne Armstrong-MooreMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Petra S MeierSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-1933
Alexandra PennDepartment of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-2862
Mohammad HassannezhadCentre for Systems Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3277-3222
Valerie WellsSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7283-6208
Laurence MooreSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2182-823X

Funding

Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate SPHSU15Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate SPHSU16Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate SPHSU20Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate, United Kingdom SPHSU16Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MC_ UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/5UK Prevention Research Partnership MR/S037578/2UKRI ESCR ES/Y001907/1UKRI ESRC ES/Y001907/1UKRI Medical Research Council SPHSU/MRC EU-Participatory Systems Mapping MC_PC_20039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipatory systems mapping (PSM) methods are increasingly applied in population health research to understand and address complex challenges. Despite their growing use, there remains limited understanding of how these approaches are implemented in practice. This systematic scoping review aimed to explore the application of PSM in population health research, identify methodological gaps and highlight opportunities for advancing methods development and reporting standards, with particular attention to participatory approaches.

methodsA systematic search of OVID MEDLINE and Scopus identified peer-reviewed papers published in English between January 2000 and September 2023 that: (1) applied and presented the results of PSM related to population health or health improvement questions and (2) incorporated a participatory design. Two reviewers screened and assessed papers, extracting data on study characteristics, participatory approaches, map features and integration of conceptual frameworks and methods not directly related to PSM.

resultsIn the 123 included studies, involving stakeholders in building causal loop diagrams was the most commonly used approach. Variability was evident in geographical focus, study design, application and reporting. Participant involvement was mostly limited to map building, with less engagement in map validation. Significant gaps in reporting study samples and procedures were identified. A small number of studies involved end users or people with lived experiences in mapping processes. Only a few studies evaluated stakeholders' experience with participatory processes. Lessons learnt on participatory processes include: PSM in population health benefits from cross-disciplinary, inclusive collaboration and capacity-building efforts that support meaningful involvement, shared ownership and trust among diverse stakeholders. Adaptability in the design of PSM approaches, continuous reflection and long-term partnerships are essential to maintaining relevance, enhancing impact and fostering systemic change over time.

conclusionsTo advance participatory systems mapping in population health, there is a need for further methodological innovation, stronger stakeholder engagement and more transparent, reflexive reporting practices. Building capacity through training, practical guidance and cross-disciplinary communities of practice will also be essential to support rigorous and inclusive application of these methods.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchPopulation HealthResearch DesignStakeholder ParticipationHumansBayesian belief networksCausal loop diagramCECAN PSMFuzzy cognitive mappingInvolvementParticipatory systems mappingPopulation healthSystem dynamicsSystems-based theory of changeSystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID41803956
PMCPMC13047807

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.