ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026
A novel device for in-situ on-demand hydrogen sulfide generation and delivery to increase tissue perfusion to chronic wounds.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is significant evidence linking deficiency in endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) to delayed healing of wounds. Systemic administration of H2S donors has been shown to markedly improve the healing rate of ischemic open wounds. This paper describes a novel H2S therapy approach, namely H2EALS™, as an exogenous supplement to accelerate healing. H2EALS™ employs a controllable process for in-situ conversion of a metal sulfide coating to H2S gas for safe and effective H2S treatment.
methodsThe core technology topically releases a targeted quantity of H2S molecules within the dressing for absorption into the open wound using control and delivery protocol specified by the end-user. Benchtop studies have evaluated precision in the rate and amount of H2S released and the degree of control, all required for safe treatment. In preclinical studies using rodent and swine models, the potential widespread dispersion of the H2S delivered was evaluated with an H2S sensing approach, while the physiological dose-response in terms of absorption and perfusion within the wound and periwound regions were examined using both H2S measurement and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI).
resultsBenchtop studies on H2EALS™ demonstrate clinically relevant performance durability and control over H2S dose administered. With low power requirement, high dosage control, and relatively low dose-to-dose variability, electroactive H2S sources with capacity of > 2 µmol/application were fabricated to last beyond a typical 14-day wound treatment period. In-vivo studies on open wounds in Sprague-Dawley rats treated at 25 to 100 nmol/dose indicated rapid tissue absorption of H2S gas. Real-time breath- and skin-emitted H2S measured on swine revealed no evidence of widespread dispersion when up to 500 nmol/dose was delivered directly to an 8-mm open wound.
conclusionOur results emphasize the need for informed delivery and absorption of H2S to the target tissue and we demonstrate the potential of the H2EALS™ technology of safe and effective H2S treatment of open wounds and in acceleration of wound healing. The results are a partial contribution to evaluating the impact of H2EALS™ on wound healing acceleration and tissue repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.