Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804284›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2026

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Behavioral Interventions for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Children That Are Delivered or Referred to by Health Providers in Primary Care.

Henrietta E Graham, Claire D Madigan, Kajal Gokal, Jessica F Large, James Sanders, Chris J McLeod, Natalie Pearson, Amanda J Daley

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Henrietta E GrahamCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0759-7992
Claire D MadiganCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6782-0017
Kajal GokalCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-1876
Jessica F LargeCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5092-7088
James SandersCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2103-0631
Chris J McLeodCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9302-1673
Natalie PearsonCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Amanda J DaleyCentre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4866-8726

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReducing childhood overweight and obesity prevalence is a global public health priority. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral weight management interventions delivered or referred to by health care providers in primary care settings.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of behavioral interventions published up to 05/01/2026, involving participants < 18 years with overweight or obesity, were identified through Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses calculated pooled mean differences in zBMI and BMI using random effects models. The primary outcome was zBMI change at 12 months; secondary outcomes included zBMI changes at program end, last follow-up, and BMI at 12 months.

resultsFifty-nine RCTs (n = 10,454) were included; 23 trials (n = 3241) contributed to the primary outcome. At 12 months, the pooled mean difference in zBMI was -0.08 (95% CI -0.13 to -0.03, p < 0.01), favoring intervention groups. At program end (n = 30), the mean difference was -0.15 (95% CI -0.22 to -0.08), and at last follow-up (n = 37), -0.08 (95% CI -0.15 to -0.02). BMI at 12 months showed a mean difference of -0.37 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.01). Interventions referred to community settings achieved greater zBMI reductions (-0.14 [95% CI -0.2 to -0.08]) than those delivered within primary care (0.04 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.18]).

conclusionsBehavioral weight management interventions for children delivered or referred to by health care professionals in primary care led to modest reductions in zBMI. Referrals to community-based interventions (e.g., HENRY) may yield greater improvements.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyOverweightPediatric ObesityPrimary Health CareBody Mass IndexChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and Consultationbehavioral weight managementchildrenobesity

Identifiers

PMID41804284
PMCPMC13371794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.