ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026
Exploring the link between glycated serum protein and esophageal metrics in diabetic GERD patients.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study assessed the relationship between glycated serum protein (GSP) and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index and esophageal baseline impedance (BI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: General clinical data of patients in the DM and DM/GERD groups were compared. Multifactorial Logistic regression analyses were performed to screen for independent factors on GERD in DM patients, and odds ratio (OR) was calculated. The risk of GERD was assessed using a spline regression model constructed on the basis of GSP, PSPW and BI. Predictive efficacy was analyzed using Receiver operating curve (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in TG, hs-CRP, GSP, PSPW, and BI between patients in the DM and DM/GERD groups. PSPW and BI (OR=0.99, p<0.01) were independent protective factors, and elevated GSP was an independent risk factor for the development of GERD. A linear relationship was validated between GSP and PSPW and BI and the prevalence risk of developing GERD in patients with DM, all with good predictive efficacy. Conclusions: GSP, PSPW, and BI show significant correlations with the onset and progression of GERD in patients and all demonstrate good predictive efficacy. However, due to the small size of the patient cohort, the generalizability of these findings requires further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.