ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
The Influencing Factors and Predictive Algorithm of Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI-ET Patients.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of estradiol and progesterone levels on human chorionic gonadotropin day with pregnancy outcomes in IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the influencing factors of clinical pregnancy outcomes for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic single sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) patients, and to establish a predictive algorithm to predict the rate of clinical pregnancy. Patients and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 1183 treatment cycles of patients undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET at Hangzhou Women's Hospital, covering the period from April 2018 to March 2023. All cases were categorized into clinical pregnancy and non-pregnant groups. Totally 24 clinical and laboratory indicators were analyzed by logistic regression model to analyze the factors affecting clinical pregnancy outcome in IVF/ICSI-ET treated couples. Furthermore, by stratifying the influencing factors and quantitatively assigning scores, a predictive algorithm was established to predict the clinical pregnancy outcomes by calculating the total score. Results: The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the male age (OR=0.965, 95% CI: 0.949~0.980) and progesterone (P) level on hCG day (OR=0.687, 95% CI: 0.500~0.944) were negatively correlated with clinical pregnancy in IVF/ICSI-ET couples, and that AMH (OR=1.085, 95% CI: 1.022~1.151), the number of high-quality embryos (OR=1.094, 95% CI: 1.039~1.152), and the number of transferred embryos (OR=2.218, 95% CI: 1.684~2.922) were positively associated with clinical pregnancy. Our multivariate logistic regression model reached a sensitivity of 64.55%, a specificity of 58.42%, and an AUC of 0.644 (95% CI: 0.614-0.673). A simple predictive algorithm of clinical pregnancy outcome was then developed using the five variables, both internal and external validations have been taken. The total score of the algorithm is between 0 and 23, and couples with total score of 10 or higher are highly likely to achieve clinical pregnancy. Conclusion: Factors affecting clinical pregnancy in infertile couples mainly included male age, AMH, P level on hCG day, number of high-quality embryos, and number of embryos transferred. Clinicians can use predictive algorithms to predict clinical pregnancy outcomes more simpler and convenient, and develop personalized embryo transfer strategies more precisely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.