Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805628›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Quality Challenges in Municipal Telecare Call Center Services: Qualitative Evaluation Using the Anchored, Realistic, Cocreated, Human, Integrated, and Evaluated (ARCHIE) Framework.

Linda C Grøndal-Eeles, Janne Dugstad, Hilde Eide, Etty Nilsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda C Grøndal-Eeles *Centre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Science, University of South-Eastern Norway, Postboks 4, Borre, 3199, Norway, 47 95109280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1136-3872
Janne Dugstad *Centre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Science, University of South-Eastern Norway, Postboks 4, Borre, 3199, Norway, 47 95109280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4731-8684
Hilde Eide *Centre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Science, University of South-Eastern Norway, Postboks 4, Borre, 3199, Norway, 47 95109280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-5047
Etty Nilsen *Centre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Science, University of South-Eastern Norway, Postboks 4, Borre, 3199, Norway, 47 95109280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2769-675X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Telecare is seen as a promising technology aimed at enhancing the accessibility and efficiency of health care services. Although focus on quality has been highly prioritized within the health care services, there is a need to explore the quality of telecare services in general and municipal telecare call centers (CCs) in particular, as health and assistive technologies are increasingly being implemented in patients' homes. Objective: The study sought to explore which factors influence the quality of telecare services provided by municipal telecare CCs in Norway, evaluated through the anchored, realistic, cocreated, human, integrated, and evaluated (ARCHIE) framework. Methods: The study had a multiple-case design. Interviews were the main source of data from 15 informants from 5 municipal telecare CCs across Norway. Observation and document studies were used for background and contextualization. To explore and evaluate quality, a combined deductive-inductive analysis was conducted. Results: Evaluated against the ARCHIE framework, none of the quality criteria were fully met. Due to the telecare service not being sufficiently anchored for all patients, it was challenging to provide realistic technologies. The collaborative work was difficult, with challenges in recruiting patients. The human principle was characterized by variation of knowledge and national guidelines. Municipal telecare CCs were not integrated into the health care services, and data must be used to a greater extent for evaluation and learning than is currently the case. Conclusions: The findings suggest that municipal telecare CC services have several shortcomings in providing high-quality health care. Relating the quality principles identified by the ARCHIE framework to normalization process theory constructs indicates that the CC service remains in a transitional phase of normalization. To improve the telecare CC services and enhance communication and integration, policymakers need to reduce fragmentation in the broader health care system. Further national standardization to professionalize the telecare CC services should be developed. The telecare CCs need to improve their service related to all indicators of the ARCHIE framework. Training for telecare operators should be prioritized.

Indexed as

Call CentersQuality of Health CareTelemedicineHumansNorwayQualitative Researchassistive technologycall centermunicipalitiespatient safetyqualitytelecaretelecare call centertelecare services

Identifiers

PMID41805628
PMCPMC12974923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.