ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Efficient information extraction using LLMs and knowledge distillation: A study on HPV health communication.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
State Department of Health (DOH) websites serve as authoritative sources of HPV-related health communications, presenting state-specific content that influences public awareness and vaccination decisions. We develop a computationally efficient framework to systematically evaluate these information repositories based on their content quality, completeness, and their motivational impact on vaccination behavior. We propose a dataset consolidating 48 different DOH websites' data targeted towards HPV and HPV vaccination. By developing an annotated dataset (n = 400), efficient prompting techniques and a Knowledge Distillation framework, we develop and evaluate efficient student models based on the Llama family of Large Language Models (LLMs) and the RoBERTa Large encoder architecture. We finally deploy the best-performing student model for a computationally feasible evaluation of the content of DOH websites. We show that fine-tuned RoBERTa Large model achieves an F1 score of 0.74 on the test set, outperforming all other student models and approaching the teacher model's performance (F1 = 0.77). The fine-tuned RoBERTa-Large model is subsequently applied to data from various state DOH websites to evaluate the information presented. We also discuss the broader implications, limitations, and ethical and legal considerations of the proposed approach.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.