Evidence mapPaperPMID 41805771Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Efficient information extraction using LLMs and knowledge distillation: A study on HPV health communication.

Saadat Hasan Khan, Kevin Lybarger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saadat Hasan KhanDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2784-3557
Kevin LybargerDepartment of Information Sciences and Technology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

State Department of Health (DOH) websites serve as authoritative sources of HPV-related health communications, presenting state-specific content that influences public awareness and vaccination decisions. We develop a computationally efficient framework to systematically evaluate these information repositories based on their content quality, completeness, and their motivational impact on vaccination behavior. We propose a dataset consolidating 48 different DOH websites' data targeted towards HPV and HPV vaccination. By developing an annotated dataset (n = 400), efficient prompting techniques and a Knowledge Distillation framework, we develop and evaluate efficient student models based on the Llama family of Large Language Models (LLMs) and the RoBERTa Large encoder architecture. We finally deploy the best-performing student model for a computationally feasible evaluation of the content of DOH websites. We show that fine-tuned RoBERTa Large model achieves an F1 score of 0.74 on the test set, outperforming all other student models and approaching the teacher model's performance (F1 = 0.77). The fine-tuned RoBERTa-Large model is subsequently applied to data from various state DOH websites to evaluate the information presented. We also discuss the broader implications, limitations, and ethical and legal considerations of the proposed approach.

Identifiers

PMID41805771
PMCPMC12974803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.