Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41805875›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

Biomechanical Model of the Levator Ani Muscle: Identifying the Greatest Strain Areas in Its Subdivisions.

Jan Zapletal, Hana Cechova, Magdalena Jansova, Robert Cimrman, Ludek Hyncik, Ladislav Krofta, Helena Robova, Lucie Hajkova Hympanova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan Zapletal *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 1150/50, 100 34, Prague 10, Czechia.
Hana Cechova *New Technologies Research Centre, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitni 8, 306 14, Pilsen, Czechia.
Magdalena JansovaNew Technologies Research Centre, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitni 8, 306 14, Pilsen, Czechia.
Robert CimrmanNew Technologies Research Centre, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitni 8, 306 14, Pilsen, Czechia.
Ludek HyncikNew Technologies Research Centre, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitni 8, 306 14, Pilsen, Czechia.
Ladislav KroftaInstitute for Mother And Child Care, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Podolske Nabrezi 157, 147 00, Prague, Czechia.
Helena RobovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 1150/50, 100 34, Prague 10, Czechia.
Lucie Hajkova HympanovaInstitute for Mother And Child Care, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Podolske Nabrezi 157, 147 00, Prague, Czechia. lucie.hympanova@upmd.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9002-9231

Funding

Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky NW26J-08-00143European Union CZ.02.01.01/00/23_021/0008828lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy 207 035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesesDuring childbirth, the levator ani muscle (LAM) is subjected to significant mechanical stress, potentially causing damage and complications such as pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence. This study investigates previously undescribed defects in regions of the LAM beyond its pubic insertion, resulting from mechanical loading during childbirth, using a computational biomechanical model to identify areas of high fiber deformation.

methodsA finite element model of the pelvic floor was developed from a 3 T MRI scan of a 23-year-old nulliparous woman. Pelvic structures were segmented, reconstructed, and modeled using isotropic hyperelastic materials. A 9 cm diameter sphere, simulating a fetal head, was passed along the curve of Carus to assess deformation in the puborectalis muscle (PRM) and pubovisceralis muscle (PVM).

resultsThe model demonstrated greater strain in the PRM compared to the PVM, with peak elongation at its pubic bone attachment. In contrast, the PVM experienced a more evenly distributed strain. Significant muscle deformation occurred at attachment sites of both muscles. Additionally, previously unreported muscle deformations in the dorsolateral region of the PVM were identified.

conclusionsThe computational model highlights high-strain regions in the LAM during childbirth, correlating with clinical observations of muscle injury. The PRM appears more susceptible to localized strain-induced damage, whereas the PVM experiences distributed strain. Notably, the model revealed previously unrecognized defects in lateral regions of the PVM, which current standard evaluations of LAM avulsions might overlook. These findings enhance our understanding of pelvic floor mechanics and could improve clinical assessments of pelvic floor dysfunction.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalParturitionPelvic FloorBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, BiologicalPregnancyStress, MechanicalYoung AdultAvulsionComputational biomechanicsLevator ani muscleMuscle strainPelvic model

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.