ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Comparative analysis of early outcomes in laparoscopic and open surgery for chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chronic pancreatitis: how does surgery step in?Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgery is the cornerstone of pain management in chronic pancreatitis, especially in patients with a dilated pancreatic duct. Lateral pancreaticojejunostomy and the Frey procedure are commonly employed decompressive techniques, performed via either open or laparoscopic approaches. This study compares postoperative outcomes and pain relief between the two approaches. In this retrospective study, 100 patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dilated main pancreatic duct (≥ 5 mm) underwent either lateral pancreaticojejunostomy or Frey procedure between 2020 and 2024. Patients with suspected malignancy, history of endoscopic therapy, or requiring pancreatic resection were excluded. Of the total, 69 underwent open surgery and 31 underwent laparoscopic surgery. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale and Izbicki scores preoperatively and at 6 months. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative parameters were recorded and analysed. Baseline characteristics and preoperative pain scores were similar between the groups. The laparoscopic group had a longer operative time (230 ± 20 vs. 198 ± 18 min; p < 0.001) but lower intraoperative blood loss (128 ± 46 vs. 149 ± 46 mL; p = 0.02). Complication rates (12.9% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.53) and hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days; p = 0.26) were comparable. Both groups showed significant pain relief at 6 months. Residual visual analogue scale scores were slightly lower in the laparoscopic group (11 ± 7 vs. 17 ± 10; p = 0.002). Laparoscopic surgery for chronic pancreatitis is as safe and effective as open surgery, offering comparable pain relief with reduced blood loss. It is a safe and viable option in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41806173What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.