Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41806173›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Comparative analysis of early outcomes in laparoscopic and open surgery for chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective study.

Saket Kumar, Ashish Kumar Sharma, Lakshit Tomar, Salman Ahmad, Sanjay Kumar, Manish Mandal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Chronic pancreatitis: how does surgery step in?Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saket KumarDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India. krsaketsingh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6556-8228
Ashish Kumar SharmaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Lakshit TomarDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Salman AhmadDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Sanjay KumarDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Manish MandalDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery is the cornerstone of pain management in chronic pancreatitis, especially in patients with a dilated pancreatic duct. Lateral pancreaticojejunostomy and the Frey procedure are commonly employed decompressive techniques, performed via either open or laparoscopic approaches. This study compares postoperative outcomes and pain relief between the two approaches. In this retrospective study, 100 patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dilated main pancreatic duct (≥ 5 mm) underwent either lateral pancreaticojejunostomy or Frey procedure between 2020 and 2024. Patients with suspected malignancy, history of endoscopic therapy, or requiring pancreatic resection were excluded. Of the total, 69 underwent open surgery and 31 underwent laparoscopic surgery. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale and Izbicki scores preoperatively and at 6 months. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative parameters were recorded and analysed. Baseline characteristics and preoperative pain scores were similar between the groups. The laparoscopic group had a longer operative time (230 ± 20 vs. 198 ± 18 min; p < 0.001) but lower intraoperative blood loss (128 ± 46 vs. 149 ± 46 mL; p = 0.02). Complication rates (12.9% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.53) and hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days; p = 0.26) were comparable. Both groups showed significant pain relief at 6 months. Residual visual analogue scale scores were slightly lower in the laparoscopic group (11 ± 7 vs. 17 ± 10; p = 0.002). Laparoscopic surgery for chronic pancreatitis is as safe and effective as open surgery, offering comparable pain relief with reduced blood loss. It is a safe and viable option in selected patients.

Indexed as

Chronic pancreatitisFrey’s procedureLateral pancreaticojejunostomyMinimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.