Evidence mapPaperPMID 41806392Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2026

Demographic and biosocial determinants of beneficial trends in older adult cognition in the USA and England: the role of cohort succession.

Cayley Ryan-Claytor, Liying Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cayley Ryan-ClaytorPopulation Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-5728-4975
Liying LuoDepartment of Sociology & Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

TRAINING IN THE DEMOGRAPHY OF AGINGT32AG000221 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 1992 to 2025
$3.4M
Training Program in Social Environments and Population HealthT32HD007514 · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · 1999 to 2025
$1.1M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · 2025 to 2025
$706k
Cohort Differences in Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Education Effects and Sex DifferencesR03AG070812 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Liying Luo · 2022 to 2022
$161k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development P2CHD041025NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078518NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000221NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007514NIH HHS R01AG078518NIH HHS R03AG070812NIH HHS T32HD007514Population Research Institute at the Pennsylvania State UniversityPopulation Studies Center at the University of Michigan T32AG000221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns about the consequences of rapid population aging in the USA and England often neglect the key demographic processes of cohort succession and its influence on population health. In this study, we quantify the extent to which trends between 2004 and 2018 in older US and English adults' cognition functioning are related to population composition changes in three areas: (i) age distribution, (ii) socioeconomic factors, and (iii) chronic disease prevalence.

methodsUsing data from the USA-based Health and Retirement Study (n = 17 305 person-years) and the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 7557 person-years), we apply the Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder two-fold decomposition to estimate the contributions of changes in each country's population composition to changes in overall cognitive functioning between 2004 and 2018.

resultsFor both men and women, improvements in cognitive functioning were largely driven by cohort succession increasing the average educational attainment of the two populations. Increases in the proportions of the youngest old adults counteracted the negative contributions of increased proportions of the oldest adults. However, increases in the prevalence of psychological conditions (for US men, US women, and English women) and the prevalence of diabetes and divorce (for US women) emerge as specific risk factors that are detrimental to continued gains in cognitive functioning.

conclusionPopulation aging may not necessarily portend an increasing burden of cognitive diseases when cohorts bring different socioeconomic and health protective and risk factors with them into older adulthood.

Indexed as

AgingCognitionAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChronic DiseaseEducational StatusEnglandFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic Factorscognitioneducationpopulation agingsocioeconomic statusUSA–England comparison

Identifiers

PMID41806392
PMCPMC12981345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.