ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
Strategies to control cellular spatial organization in microphysiological systems.
Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Adaptive Resilience to Catastrophic Systems Collapse: Endothelial Entropy, Ferroptotic Propagation, and the Maternal Point of No Return in Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development of a compartmentalized silk fibroin-reinforced GelMA hydrogel platform for kidney-inspired tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Modeling and targeting the hostile physicochemical niche in bone metastasis: from experimental platforms to niche-directed therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial organization is fundamental to tissue physiology, as it governs how cells migrate, grow, differentiate, and interact within their native environments. In living tissues, cells are positioned within finely tuned microarchitectures defined by chemical gradients, boundaries, and mechanical cues - features that are essential for proper tissue function and homeostasis. Microphysiological systems (MPSs) aim to replicate key aspects of human tissue in vitro, yet without appropriate spatial control, they often fail to reproduce certain aspects of tissue-level organization and function. In this review, we categorize spatial patterning strategies into two main approaches: direct methods, which involve the physical placement of cells or compartments using techniques such as 3D bioprinting, microfluidic compartmentalization, and physical trapping; and indirect methods, which rely on cellular responses to engineered environmental cues, including extracellular matrix (ECM) composition, mechanical gradients, and soluble factor distributions. While direct methods offer precision and reproducibility, indirect strategies more closely reflect natural developmental and self-organizing processes. We discuss how these approaches are applied across diverse biological structures, from cellular interfaces and barrier tissues to dynamic host-microbe systems. Enhancing spatial fidelity in MPSs is essential for recapitulating tissue complexity, and will be key to advancing disease modeling, developmental biology, and drug screening applications.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.