Reviewnpj aging2026
Emerging strategies in senotherapeutics: from broad-spectrum senolysis to precision reprogramming.
Review in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular senescence, originally described as a finite proliferative arrest in cultured somatic cells, has since been recognized as a central mechanism underlying aging and the development of age-associated disorders. The progressive accumulation of senescent cells (SnCs) promotes chronic inflammation through the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) and circumvents immune-mediated clearance by upregulating pro-survival and immune checkpoint pathways. Early "first-generation" senolytics, including navitoclax (ABT-263) and the dasatinib-quercetin (D + Q) combination, provided proof-of-concept that selective removal of SnCs can alleviate certain fibrotic, metabolic, and cardiovascular pathologies in preclinical studies. However, these agents exhibited notable drawbacks, such as dose-dependent thrombocytopenia, variable therapeutic efficacy, and the emergence of resistance mechanisms. Consequently, current research has shifted toward precision senotherapy, though significant translational challenges remain. This review synthesizes three next-generation strategies developed to address limitations of early senolytic agents. (1) Immune-based senolysis: This approach applies immuno-oncology principles to counter immune evasion of SnCs. Strategies include blocking immunosuppressive ligands such as GD3 ganglioside, engineering chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells to target senescence-specific surface markers like urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and exploiting metabolic vulnerabilities (e.g., glutaminolysis and ferroptosis) to sensitize SnCs to immune-mediated clearance. (2) Tissue-precision proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs): These agents recruit organ- or tissue-specific E3 ligases (e.g., von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)) to selectively degrade anti-apoptotic proteins such as BCL-xL. Localized activity may reduce systemic toxicity and mitigate dose-limiting effects observed with traditional inhibitors. (3) Microbiome-epigenetic interplay: This strategy modulates the gut-liver axis to enhance senolytic efficacy. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as butyrate, epigenetically regulate drug transporter expression and suppress the SASP, while dietary interventions may create a microenvironment favorable to senolysis. These approaches offer potentially more targeted and personalized therapeutic options but face significant challenges, including immunopathology, manufacturing complexity, off-target effects, and long-term safety concerns. The ongoing shift from broad inhibition to precision reprogramming represents a promising but preliminary step in the treatment of age-related diseases.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.