ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of sex differences on the emergence of ctDNA RAS mutations in RAS wild-type colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In some cases of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), mutant RAS may emerge during chemotherapy. This study aimed to identify the clinicopathological factors associated with the emergence of RAS mutations during treatment. This single-center retrospective study included 43 patients with mCRC harboring microsatellite stable RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC who underwent RAS trace via a ctDNA assay between August 1, 2020 and April 30, 2023. The clinicopathological factors were classified as follows: pre-treatment and during treatment (when the ctDNA assay was performed). An exploratory analysis was performed to clarify the factors contributing to the emergence of RAS mutations. The RAS mutation was detected in 13 (30.2%) patients, presenting in KRAS codon 12 (46%), KRAS codon 61 (23%), NRAS codon 61 (23%), and NRAS codon 12 (8%). In a univariate analysis, RAS reversion from wild-type to mutant-type was observed to occur with a greater frequency in younger patients, females, and those with high serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels at ctDNA collection. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.68, p = 0.016) and high serum CEA levels at the time of ctDNA assay during chemotherapy (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-4.80, p = 0.004) were independent factors for RAS mutation emergence. The overall survival rates were comparable between the RAS mutation emergence and persistent RAS wild-type groups (p = 0.88). In RAS wild-type mCRC, female patients and patients with high CEA levels may benefit from precision treatment strategies that incorporate real-time genetic monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.