ArticleScientific reports2026
Intestinal morphology and host‑ and system‑associated microbiome dynamics during short‑term fasting and refeeding of Atlantic salmon in recirculating aquaculture systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-term fasting is common in aquaculture prior to handling events, yet its impact on microbial communities and fish health remains poorly understood. We assessed the effects of a 5-day fasting period followed by refeeding on microbial dynamics in a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS), with RAS communities sampled after 5 days of refeeding and the mucosal skin and intestine microbiomes of post-smolt Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) sampled after 6 days. The biofilter and biofilm bacterial profiles remained relatively stable throughout fasting and refeeding, unlike the water microbiome, which showed the most significant changes during refeeding, consistent with distinct microbial growth strategies under fluctuating nutrient conditions. The skin mucus microbiome shares similarities with trends in the water microbiome. No change in skin histomorphometry was observed during the fasting and refeeding periods. In contrast, distal intestinal tissue structures showed differences during the fasting period, indicating potential effects on the intestinal health of salmon. Notably, fasted fish had a higher relative abundance of Vibrio bacteria in their remaining digesta. Neither fasting or subsequent refeeding had any effect upon injury-based operational welfare indicators (OWIs) or serum cortisol levels. The study sheds light on the interactions between short-term fasting, microbial community dynamics, and Atlantic salmon health in RAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.