ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Validation structures for sequence variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer.
Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid minigene workflow for functional reclassification of splicing variants in hereditary cancer diagnostics.Journal of medical genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hereditary cancer syndromes are among the most common inherited disorders and contribute to nearly 10% of solid tumours. While genetic testing is now central to diagnosis, surveillance, and cascade prevention, its impact is constrained by the persistent challenge of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), which comprise almost 40% of reported hereditary cancer syndrome-associated variants in ClinVar. These unresolved classifications undermine the interpretive power of testing, limiting its translational and preventive potential. In this review, we examine the foundations of variant interpretation, the role of expert-guided specifications, and emerging methods for VUS reclassification, including population-level data, RNA- and protein-based functional assays, computational predictors, and long-read sequencing. We further highlight how systematic re-evaluation structures and curation infrastructures translate new evidence into clinical practice. We conclude with an outlook on future directions to reduce the burden of VUS and increase the clinical utility of hereditary cancer syndrome testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.